Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 17:40

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Stunning and mysterious 'red sprite' lightning storm captured in photos - Earth.com
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Is it painful for men to wear bras, panties, and tampons?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
‘Echo Valley’ Is the Trashiest A-List Lifetime Movie You’ve Ever Seen - rollingstone.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
He chose to serve longer in the Army. Now he's saddled with $40,000 in moving costs. - NBC News
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
2025 NBA Finals MVP Rankings: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Tyrese Haliburton and More - Bleacher Report
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Nicole Scherzinger and Sarah Snook win top prizes at Tony Awards - BBC
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: